Lead Channel (U Section) Weight

Mass per metre and per foot for lead channel (u section) at 11,340 kg/m³ (ASTM B29 (UNS L50049, chemical lead)). Every figure is for the section as drawn. A 6 m length of this size weighs 200.0 kg (448.1 lb per 20 ft).

Mass / length
33.340kg/m
22.403 lb/ft
Cross-section
2,940.0mm²
4.5570 in²
Reference size
200 × 75 × 8 × 10mm
h, b, t_w, t_f
Density
11,340kg/m³
0.4097 lb/in³
6 m / 20 ft length
200.0kg
448.1 lb

At the reference dimensions (h = 200 mm, b = 75 mm, t_w = 8 mm, t_f = 10 mm) this section has a cross-sectional area of 2,940.0 mm², giving 33.340 kg/m (22.403 lb/ft). Against carbon steel's 7,850 kg/m³ that is +44.5 % — the same section in steel would be 23.079 kg/m.

Calculate your own dimensions → Pipe and hollow sections

Channel (U Section) — formula and derivation

Area of a channel (u section)

A = 2·b·t_f + (h − 2·t_f)·t_w

A = 2 × b × t_f + (h − 2 × t_f) × t_w, where h is the overall depth, b the flange width, t_f the flange thickness and t_w the web thickness

Worked through with the default dimensions:

A = 2·b·t_f + (h − 2·t_f)·t_wFlanges = 2 × 75 × 10 = 1500.0 mm²Web = (200 − 2 × 10) × 8 = 180.0 × 8 = 1440.0 mm²A = 1500.0 + 1440.0A = 2940.0 mm²
h
Depth
b
Flange width
t_w
Web thickness
t_f
Flange thickness

Weight follows from the area with no further geometry: m = A × 10⁻⁶ × ρ, where A is in mm², ρ in kg/m³ and m in kg/m. At 11,340 kg/m³ that is 33.3396 kg/m for the reference size above.

Lead channel (u section) — size series

Lead channel (u section) — nominal size series
Depth Flange width Web thickness Flange thickness Cross-section Mass / length
80.0 40.0 5.0 7.0 890.00 mm² · 1.3795 in² 10.093 kg/m · 6.782 lb/ft
100.0 46.0 5.5 7.5 1,157.50 mm² · 1.7941 in² 13.126 kg/m · 8.820 lb/ft
120.0 52.0 6.0 8.0 1,456.00 mm² · 2.2568 in² 16.511 kg/m · 11.095 lb/ft
140.0 58.0 6.0 8.5 1,724.00 mm² · 2.6722 in² 19.550 kg/m · 13.137 lb/ft
160.0 64.0 6.5 9.0 2,075.00 mm² · 3.2163 in² 23.530 kg/m · 15.812 lb/ft
180.0 70.0 7.0 9.5 2,457.00 mm² · 3.8084 in² 27.862 kg/m · 18.723 lb/ft
200.0 76.0 7.5 10.0 2,870.00 mm² · 4.4485 in² 32.546 kg/m · 21.870 lb/ft
220.0 82.0 8.0 10.5 3,314.00 mm² · 5.1367 in² 37.581 kg/m · 25.253 lb/ft
240.0 88.0 8.5 11.0 3,789.00 mm² · 5.8730 in² 42.967 kg/m · 28.873 lb/ft
260.0 94.0 9.0 11.5 4,295.00 mm² · 6.6573 in² 48.705 kg/m · 32.728 lb/ft
280.0 100.0 9.5 12.0 4,832.00 mm² · 7.4896 in² 54.795 kg/m · 36.820 lb/ft
300.0 106.0 10.0 13.0 5,496.00 mm² · 8.5188 in² 62.325 kg/m · 41.880 lb/ft
320.0 112.0 10.5 13.5 6,100.50 mm² · 9.4558 in² 69.180 kg/m · 46.487 lb/ft
350.0 122.0 11.0 15.0 7,180.00 mm² · 11.1290 in² 81.421 kg/m · 54.713 lb/ft
400.0 138.0 12.0 17.0 9,084.00 mm² · 14.0802 in² 103.013 kg/m · 69.221 lb/ft

Nominal estimating series — round-numbered geometry, not any standard’s tabulated shape. Weight is exact for the dimensions shown. For UPN / C / MC section properties use the mill’s own table. Computed for Lead at 11340 kg/m³.

How to read this table

Each row is one nominal size. Because the area is computed from your dimensions rather than read from a mill table, a non-standard size is just as accurate — put it into the calculator above rather than interpolating between rows.

The same channel (u section) in every material

Geometry is fixed and only density changes, so this table is the whole material-selection question in one view. Lead is highlighted. The percentage column is against carbon steel, which is the figure most quotations are built on.

Channel (U Section) at h = 200 mm, b = 75 mm, t_w = 8 mm, t_f = 10 mm — mass in every material
Material Density kg/m³ lb/in³ Mass / length kg/m lb/ft vs carbon steel
Carbon Steel 7,850 0.2836 23.079 15.508 +0.0 %
Stainless Steel 304 8,000 0.2890 23.520 15.805 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 316 8,000 0.2890 23.520 15.805 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 316L 8,000 0.2890 23.520 15.805 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 430 7,700 0.2782 22.638 15.212 -1.9 %
Aluminum 6061-T6 2,700 0.0975 7.938 5.334 -65.6 %
Aluminum 5052-H32 2,680 0.0968 7.879 5.295 -65.9 %
Aluminum 7075-T6 2,810 0.1015 8.261 5.551 -64.2 %
Copper C11000 8,940 0.3230 26.284 17.662 +13.9 %
Brass C36000 8,500 0.3071 24.990 16.793 +8.3 %
Bronze C93200 8,800 0.3179 25.872 17.385 +12.1 %
Titanium Grade 2 4,510 0.1629 13.259 8.910 -42.5 %
Gray Cast Iron 7,200 0.2601 21.168 14.224 -8.3 %
Lead 11,340 0.4097 33.340 22.403 +44.5 %
Rigid PVC (Type I) 1,400 0.0506 4.116 2.766 -82.2 %
HDPE (PE 100) 960 0.0347 2.822 1.897 -87.8 %

Same geometry throughout, so the only variable is density. Carbon steel is highlighted as the baseline.

A note on using this table for costing: mass is not price. Aluminium is roughly a third of steel's mass here, but per kilogram it costs several times more, so a straight swap rarely saves money — what it buys is reduced load on a structure or a vehicle.

About lead

The densest material in the catalogue at 11,340 kg/m³ — 44 % heavier than carbon steel — and used precisely for that. Lead sheet is specified for acoustic and radiation shielding, where the performance metric is mass per unit area, so a sheet weight table is not an incidental output here, it is the design input: 1 mm of lead is about 11.34 kg/m². It is also extremely soft and creeps under sustained load, so it is normally supported, not self-carrying.

Density
11,340 kg/m³ = 0.4097 lb/in³ · 1.4446× carbon steel · typical spread ±1 %
Specification
ASTM B29 (UNS L50049, chemical lead)
Equivalents
EN PB000 · GB Pb1
Typical uses
Radiation shielding · Acoustic and vibration isolation · Roof flashing and damp courses · Battery plates
Weight-relevant caution

Heavy-metal hazard: machining, welding and dross handling require controls. Creeps under its own weight at ambient temperature.

About channel (u section)

Channel is the only shape here with four independent dimensions, and it is the one where a supplier’s actual product most often differs from the drawing: nominal channel sizes are named by depth while the flange width, web and flange thicknesses vary between standards and even between mills. The weight consequence is real — a 200 mm channel with a 7.5 mm web and a 200 mm channel with an 8.5 mm web differ by about 4 % in mass. For anything ordered by the tonne, get the mill’s section mass and use the calculator only for sanity checks.

When ordering

Specified by depth in a named standard (UPN 200, C8×11.5, MC 200) — never by depth alone, because different standards use different webs and flanges.

Download this data

Lead channel (u section) — CSV

Both buttons below read the tables rendered on this page, so the file matches what you are looking at. The full catalogue — all 16 materials across all 10 sections — is on the downloads page.

All materials (CSV · 16 × 10 pages)

Fields are quoted per RFC 4180, with a UTF-8 byte-order mark so Excel reads the mm² and · characters correctly. Blank lines separate the weight matrix from the area matrix.

Frequently asked questions

How much does lead channel (u section) weigh?

At the reference dimensions (h = 200 mm, b = 75 mm, t_w = 8 mm, t_f = 10 mm) a lead channel (u section) of this size weighs 33.340 kg/m, or 22.403 lb/ft. The table above lists the figure for every standard size so you can read your size directly instead of scaling.

How is the weight of channel (u section) calculated?

Weight is cross-sectional area × length × density. For this shape the area is A = 2·b·t_f + (h − 2·t_f)·t_w. At the reference dimensions that gives 2,940.0 mm², and multiplying by lead's density of 11,340 kg/m³ gives 33.340 kg/m. Nothing is looked up in a table — which is why a non-standard size is calculated just as accurately as a standard one.

Why does lead weigh more or less than steel?

It is heavier than carbon steel for the same section — about 44 % heavier at 11,340 kg/m³. Density is the only variable: the cross-sectional area depends purely on geometry, so a channel (u section) of the same dimensions has the same area in every material and the mass simply scales with density. In this case the ratio is 1.4446× carbon steel.

What is the cross-sectional area of a channel (u section)?

The area depends only on the dimensions, not on the material, so it is identical whichever material you select: at the reference dimensions it is 2,940.0 mm² (4.5570 in²). That is the number you would enter into a stress or deflection calculation, and it is why changing material on this page never changes the area column.

Does a lead channel (u section) weigh the same as a lead part of a different shape?

No, and the difference is larger than most people expect. At equal nominal size, a square bar is 27.3 % heavier than a round bar, and a hollow section is typically 60–80 % lighter than the solid bar it replaces. Weight follows area, and area changes faster than dimensions do — which is exactly why this needs calculating rather than estimating.

Should I use Lead weight or carbon steel weight for costing?

Use the material you are actually buying. At 11,340 kg/m³ against carbon steel's 7,850 kg/m³, the same channel (u section) differs by 44.5 % in mass. On a per-metre quote that is invisible; on a fabricated tonnage it is the difference between a margin and a loss. This page computes the steel figure as 23.079 kg/m for comparison.

Other materials, same channel (u section)

The same geometry in every material, so the only variable is density.

Other Lead sections

The same density applied to every shape the site covers.

Reference data and tools

Data source and method

Channel (U Section) area from A = 2·b·t_f + (h − 2·t_f)·t_w. Mass computed as area × length × density at 11,340 kg/m³ (ASTM B29 (UNS L50049, chemical lead)). No weight on this page is copied from a published table — which is why figures can differ in the last significant digit from a mill's chart calculated at a nominal density.

  • Elementary plane geometry. The circle, polygon and hollow-section area formulas.
  • ASTM material specifications for each grade named in the material entry (A36, A240/A276, B209/B211/B221, B152/B16/B505, B265/B348, A48, B29, D1784, D3350).
  • BIPM / NIST definitional constants: international inch = 25.4 mm, foot = 0.3048 m, pound = 0.45359237 kg.

Dataset version 2026.09.1 · dimensions last verified against source 2026-09-21. Found an error? Report it — corrections are issued with a version bump.