Aluminum 7075-T6 Square Bar Weight

Mass per metre and per foot for aluminum 7075-t6 square bar at 2,810 kg/m³ (ASTM B211 / B209 (T6 temper)). Every figure is for the section as drawn. A 6 m length of this size weighs 10.5 kg (23.6 lb per 20 ft).

Mass / length
1.756kg/m
1.180 lb/ft
Cross-section
625.0mm²
0.9688 in²
Reference size
25mm
a
Density
2,810kg/m³
0.1015 lb/in³
6 m / 20 ft length
10.5kg
23.6 lb

At the reference dimensions (a = 25 mm) this section has a cross-sectional area of 625.0 mm², giving 1.756 kg/m (1.180 lb/ft). Against carbon steel's 7,850 kg/m³ that is -64.2 % — the same section in steel would be 4.906 kg/m.

Calculate your own dimensions → Pipe and hollow sections

Square Bar — formula and derivation

Area of a square bar

A = a²

A = a², where a is the side length

Worked through with the default dimensions:

A = a²A = 25²A = 625.0 mm²
a
Side

Weight follows from the area with no further geometry: m = A × 10⁻⁶ × ρ, where A is in mm², ρ in kg/m³ and m in kg/m. At 2,810 kg/m³ that is 1.7563 kg/m for the reference size above.

AL 7075 square bar — size series

Aluminum 7075-T6 square bar — by side
Side Cross-section Mass / length
6.0 mm 36.00 mm² · 0.0558 in² 0.101 kg/m · 0.068 lb/ft
8.0 mm 64.00 mm² · 0.0992 in² 0.180 kg/m · 0.121 lb/ft
10 mm 100.00 mm² · 0.1550 in² 0.281 kg/m · 0.189 lb/ft
12 mm 144.00 mm² · 0.2232 in² 0.405 kg/m · 0.272 lb/ft
16 mm 256.00 mm² · 0.3968 in² 0.719 kg/m · 0.483 lb/ft
20 mm 400.00 mm² · 0.6200 in² 1.124 kg/m · 0.755 lb/ft
25 mm 625.00 mm² · 0.9688 in² 1.756 kg/m · 1.180 lb/ft
30 mm 900.00 mm² · 1.3950 in² 2.529 kg/m · 1.699 lb/ft
40 mm 1,600.00 mm² · 2.4800 in² 4.496 kg/m · 3.021 lb/ft
50 mm 2,500.00 mm² · 3.8750 in² 7.025 kg/m · 4.721 lb/ft
60 mm 3,600.00 mm² · 5.5800 in² 10.116 kg/m · 6.798 lb/ft
80 mm 6,400.00 mm² · 9.9200 in² 17.984 kg/m · 12.085 lb/ft
100 mm 10,000.00 mm² · 15.5000 in² 28.100 kg/m · 18.882 lb/ft

Computed for AL 7075 at 2810 kg/m³ (0.1015 lb/in³). ASTM B211 / B209 (T6 temper).

How to read this table

Each row is one nominal size. Because the area is computed from your dimensions rather than read from a mill table, a non-standard size is just as accurate — put it into the calculator above rather than interpolating between rows.

Imperial sizes

Square Bar is also bought in inch sizes. The conversions below are exact (1 in = 25.4 mm by definition), so the metric equivalents are the true millimetre dimensions rather than a rounded nominal figure.

AL 7075 — common inch square bar
Stock size Metric equivalent mm Cross-section Mass / length
1/4 in 6.35 40.32 mm² · 0.0625 in² 0.113 kg/m · 0.076 lb/ft
3/8 in 9.52 90.73 mm² · 0.1406 in² 0.255 kg/m · 0.171 lb/ft
1/2 in 12.70 161.29 mm² · 0.2500 in² 0.453 kg/m · 0.305 lb/ft
5/8 in 15.88 252.02 mm² · 0.3906 in² 0.708 kg/m · 0.476 lb/ft
3/4 in 19.05 362.90 mm² · 0.5625 in² 1.020 kg/m · 0.685 lb/ft
1 in 25.40 645.16 mm² · 1.0000 in² 1.813 kg/m · 1.218 lb/ft
1-1/4 in 31.75 1,008.06 mm² · 1.5625 in² 2.833 kg/m · 1.903 lb/ft
1-1/2 in 38.10 1,451.61 mm² · 2.2500 in² 4.079 kg/m · 2.741 lb/ft
2 in 50.80 2,580.64 mm² · 4.0000 in² 7.252 kg/m · 4.873 lb/ft
2-1/2 in 63.50 4,032.25 mm² · 6.2500 in² 11.331 kg/m · 7.614 lb/ft
3 in 76.20 5,806.44 mm² · 9.0000 in² 16.316 kg/m · 10.964 lb/ft
4 in 101.60 10,322.56 mm² · 16.0000 in² 29.006 kg/m · 19.491 lb/ft

Stock sizes in inches, converted exactly at 25.4 mm per inch. Material: Aluminum 7075-T6 at 2810 kg/m³.

The same square bar in every material

Geometry is fixed and only density changes, so this table is the whole material-selection question in one view. Aluminum 7075-T6 is highlighted. The percentage column is against carbon steel, which is the figure most quotations are built on.

Square Bar at a = 25 mm — mass in every material
Material Density kg/m³ lb/in³ Mass / length kg/m lb/ft vs carbon steel
Carbon Steel 7,850 0.2836 4.906 3.297 +0.0 %
Stainless Steel 304 8,000 0.2890 5.000 3.360 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 316 8,000 0.2890 5.000 3.360 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 316L 8,000 0.2890 5.000 3.360 +1.9 %
Stainless Steel 430 7,700 0.2782 4.813 3.234 -1.9 %
Aluminum 6061-T6 2,700 0.0975 1.688 1.134 -65.6 %
Aluminum 5052-H32 2,680 0.0968 1.675 1.126 -65.9 %
Aluminum 7075-T6 2,810 0.1015 1.756 1.180 -64.2 %
Copper C11000 8,940 0.3230 5.588 3.755 +13.9 %
Brass C36000 8,500 0.3071 5.313 3.570 +8.3 %
Bronze C93200 8,800 0.3179 5.500 3.696 +12.1 %
Titanium Grade 2 4,510 0.1629 2.819 1.894 -42.5 %
Gray Cast Iron 7,200 0.2601 4.500 3.024 -8.3 %
Lead 11,340 0.4097 7.088 4.763 +44.5 %
Rigid PVC (Type I) 1,400 0.0506 0.875 0.588 -82.2 %
HDPE (PE 100) 960 0.0347 0.600 0.403 -87.8 %

Same geometry throughout, so the only variable is density. Carbon steel is highlighted as the baseline.

A note on using this table for costing: mass is not price. Aluminium is roughly a third of steel's mass here, but per kilogram it costs several times more, so a straight swap rarely saves money — what it buys is reduced load on a structure or a vehicle.

About aluminum 7075-t6

Zinc-bearing, aerospace-grade and the strongest aluminium in ordinary supply — comparable in strength to some mild steels. It is also the densest aluminium here at 2,810 kg/m³, which is the trade-off nobody mentions: choosing 7075 over 6061 for strength costs 4.1 % more mass for the same volume. Its corrosion resistance is poor without cladding or anodising, and it is generally considered unweldable, so it belongs in machined and riveted parts, not fabricated frames.

Density
2,810 kg/m³ = 0.1015 lb/in³ · 0.3580× carbon steel · typical spread ±1 %
Specification
ASTM B211 / B209 (T6 temper)
Equivalents
EN AW-7075 · JIS A7075 · GB 7075
Typical uses
Aerospace structural parts · High-load bicycle and motorsport · Moulds and tooling plate · Precision machined fittings
Weight-relevant caution

Not recommended for sustained elevated-temperature service; strength falls off well before 6061’s does.

About square bar

A square bar has 27.3 % more area than the round bar that circumscribes it (a = d) and 21.5 % more mass — the corners of the square sit outside the circle. The reverse comparison is more useful in practice: a round bar of diameter d fits inside a square of side d with material to spare, so swapping square for round at the same nominal size removes about 21 % of the weight and produces a very similar-looking part.

When ordering

Specified by side. State whether corners must be sharp or radiused; standard stock usually has a small corner radius.

Download this data

AL 7075 square bar — CSV

Both buttons below read the tables rendered on this page, so the file matches what you are looking at. The full catalogue — all 16 materials across all 10 sections — is on the downloads page.

All materials (CSV · 16 × 10 pages)

Fields are quoted per RFC 4180, with a UTF-8 byte-order mark so Excel reads the mm² and · characters correctly. Blank lines separate the weight matrix from the area matrix.

Frequently asked questions

How much does aluminum 7075-t6 square bar weigh?

At the reference dimensions (a = 25 mm) a aluminum 7075-t6 square bar of this size weighs 1.756 kg/m, or 1.180 lb/ft. The table above lists the figure for every standard size so you can read your size directly instead of scaling.

How is the weight of square bar calculated?

Weight is cross-sectional area × length × density. For this shape the area is A = a². At the reference dimensions that gives 625.0 mm², and multiplying by aluminum 7075-t6's density of 2,810 kg/m³ gives 1.756 kg/m. Nothing is looked up in a table — which is why a non-standard size is calculated just as accurately as a standard one.

Why does aluminum 7075-t6 weigh more or less than steel?

It is lighter than carbon steel for the same section — about 64 % lighter at 2,810 kg/m³. Density is the only variable: the cross-sectional area depends purely on geometry, so a square bar of the same dimensions has the same area in every material and the mass simply scales with density. In this case the ratio is 0.3580× carbon steel.

What is the cross-sectional area of a square bar?

The area depends only on the dimensions, not on the material, so it is identical whichever material you select: at the reference dimensions it is 625.0 mm² (0.9688 in²). That is the number you would enter into a stress or deflection calculation, and it is why changing material on this page never changes the area column.

Does a al 7075 square bar weigh the same as a al 7075 part of a different shape?

No, and the difference is larger than most people expect. At equal nominal size, a square bar is 27.3 % heavier than a round bar, and a hollow section is typically 60–80 % lighter than the solid bar it replaces. Weight follows area, and area changes faster than dimensions do — which is exactly why this needs calculating rather than estimating.

Should I use AL 7075 weight or carbon steel weight for costing?

Use the material you are actually buying. At 2,810 kg/m³ against carbon steel's 7,850 kg/m³, the same square bar differs by 64.2 % in mass. On a per-metre quote that is invisible; on a fabricated tonnage it is the difference between a margin and a loss. This page computes the steel figure as 4.906 kg/m for comparison.

Other materials, same square bar

The same geometry in every material, so the only variable is density.

Other AL 7075 sections

The same density applied to every shape the site covers.

Reference data and tools

Data source and method

Square Bar area from A = a². Mass computed as area × length × density at 2,810 kg/m³ (ASTM B211 / B209 (T6 temper)). No weight on this page is copied from a published table — which is why figures can differ in the last significant digit from a mill's chart calculated at a nominal density.

  • Elementary plane geometry. The circle, polygon and hollow-section area formulas.
  • ASTM material specifications for each grade named in the material entry (A36, A240/A276, B209/B211/B221, B152/B16/B505, B265/B348, A48, B29, D1784, D3350).
  • BIPM / NIST definitional constants: international inch = 25.4 mm, foot = 0.3048 m, pound = 0.45359237 kg.

Dataset version 2026.09.1 · dimensions last verified against source 2026-09-21. Found an error? Report it — corrections are issued with a version bump.